Many of these unlawful acts would traumatize the survivors from the war for the remainder of their lives. One example of this is when deterring what atrocities the SS Einsatzgruppen committed, he read their reports The nuremberg trials essay they invaded the Soviet Union with the intention of rounding up and executing Jews, Gypsies and others they considered "dangerous": However, this argument fails to address several key issues in determining the accountability of Nazi war criminals.
Prior to this, it was mainly used for Nazi ceremonies and was known as the place, where the Party was formed.
Under German law, the victims never had the privilege of a trial or adequate representation, unlike the Nazi leaders at Nuremberg, who helped orchestrate crimes and atrocities.
It takes a lot of courage to go in front of the world and admit what you did was not right. When the OSI told him his U. He eventually received a Distinguished Service Medal for his work in the space program.
The verdict stated that Karl Doenitz was guilty on counts two and three and was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment. If the trials were in fact the "brain child" [sic] of International Jewry, a declaration of the criminality of important Nazi organizations like the High Command and the SA would have been inevitable.
Under German law, the victims never had the privilege of a trial or adequate representation, unlike the Nazi leaders at Nuremberg, who helped orchestrate crimes and atrocities. It should be, I believe, the final chapter by the United States in this case p, Some of these men eventually faced persecution for their crimes but overall, most criminal managed to go unpunished.
To declare Germany as the "aggressor" does not mean every German should be held accountable for the Holocaust or any other Nuremberg charges. Weber obviously overlooked this when he blamed the World Jewish Congress and the World Zionist Organization for the trials. He had been exposed by a French woman who was investigating escaped Nazis but he remained protected by the corrupt Bolivian junta.
Some of the defendants such as Alfred Jodl, Wilhelm Keitel and Hans Frank used the defence that they were just following orders.
In terms of declaring Germany the "aggressor" nation and declaring organizations like the SS and the Gestapo as criminal, the Nuremberg trials were a success.
Goering claimed the acts they committed were excusable because they were in war and Hitler believed there was no such thing as a "just war". It was mainly aimed at the accusation of the Nazi leaders and the punitive force who participated in the escalation of World War II, as well as the outbreak of Holocaust.
Four prosecutorial teams assembled to address the charges, and there were four judges, as well as alternates, from the four representative nations. It takes a lot of courage to go in front of the world and admit what you did was not right. Every institution in Germany was at the time, under Nazi control, therefore the organizations all worked towards achieving the goals of the Nazi Party, genocide of massive and unparalleled proportions.
The Tribunal does not propose to allow any of the other defendants to go over the same ground in their evidence except insofar as it is necessary for their own defense p, Since Hitler, Himmler and Gobbels were dead, these two men were considered the symbol of the evils of Nazism.
He prepared and prosecuted charges of war crimes against humanity by Nazi leaders. He felt the trials were unjust because the entire nation of Germany was indicted and presumed guilty. Until the purge beginning on 30 Junethe SA was a group composed in large part of ruffians and bullies who participated in the Nazi outrages of that period.
Unfortunately, the nature of these crimes is such that both prosecution and judgment must be by victor nations over vanquished foes. It is enough to read the reports of the Nuremberg Trials to realize that all of Germany was the object of the bill of indictment The incriminations were for the crimes against peace, crimes against the mankind and war crimes.
He commanded the Luftwaffe in the attack on Poland and throughout the aggressive wars which followed. Since these were the most appalling crimes committed against basic human rights that the world has ever seen, Jackson explained that in order for civilization to recover from such unprecedented evils, civilization had a moral obligation to persecute these crimes p, To forget the genocide is to condone it.
No nation, race or person deserves to be put through this kind of cruelty and there is no justifiable reason for these actions.Nuremberg Trials Essay The Nuremberg Trials generally refers to the trials against members of the German leadership for war crimes committed in the period leading up to and during World War II.
The decision to try these individuals was made during the war. Nuremberg, Germany, was ironically chosen for the trials, namely in the Palace of Justice. Prior to this, it was mainly used for Nazi ceremonies and was known as the place, where the Party was formed.
The Nuremberg Trials Essay example Words | 6 Pages. The Nuremberg Trials On June 22, representatives from France, Great Britain, Russia, and the United States started to plan the prosecution of the main Axis war criminals.
The Nuremberg Trials Essay - The Nuremberg Trials On June 22, representatives from France, Great Britain, Russia, and the United States started to plan. A Study Of The Nuremberg Main Trial International Law Essay In this essay the aptness of the indictments, the matter of jurisdiction and the legality in terms of the fair trial principle will be explored.
The Nuremberg Trials were successful in "officially" recognizing the atrocities of the Nazis during and before World War II but they were not successful in holding all accountable for their administrative or direct participation in Nazi genocide.Download