The refutation of medical paternalism by alan goldman

While it is clear that for some to characterize a policy as paternalistic is to condemn or criticize it, that does not establish that the term itself is an evaluative one. Science flew men to the moon. If he knows, and wants to, say, commit suicide he must be allowed to proceed.

A recent study in the context of end-of-life care showed the effect of a default is not weakened when people are told that a default was chosen because it is usually effective Lowenstein et al.

Why did He suddenly desire to create the Universe? And I demand justice. Justifying Coercive Paternalism, Cambridge: Black, insists his medical standard is not to disclose since telling the patient of the risk could contribute to the likelihood of impotence. Finally, it is important to distinguish paternalism, whether welfare or moral, from other ideas used to justify interference with persons; even cases where the interference is not justified in terms of protecting or promoting the interests of others.

True, many good and brilliant people believed it once. The early critics attempted to distinguish interventions such as Cafeteria from interventions such as merely providing information.

The first is that nudging often occurs without the nudged being aware they are being nudged. We hear that violence is not in the Koran, that Islam means peace, that this is a hijacking by extremists and a smear campaign and so on. Call these broad nudges.

Note that there could be an even more transparent feature of nudges—call them very broad nudges. But one might believe that the question of whether more good than harm is produced is not simply an empirical one.

Consider the cafeteria example. It requires motorcyclists to wear helmets. This is not ideology. Perhaps the person in fact consents but this is not known to the paternaliser. But 29 cities, 70 towns and countless villages deposit about million gallons of raw sewage a day directly into the river.

However one comes out on the issue of whether the definition of paternalism is useful or not we turn to the more important issues about whether, and in what circumstances, nudges are justifiable ways of influencing persons to make certain choices. Given that many employees often fail to enroll opt-in in retirement plans, employers make the default automatic enrollment in such programs, allowing employees to easily opt-out.

While the a risk may seem insignificant to the doctor, the patient may have a different opinion. In order to influence students to make healthier food choices as they pass the cafeteria options place the healthy foods at eye level and place the less healthy choices higher or lower than eye level.

The claim is that, unlike traditional paternalism which rules out choices by compulsion or adds costs to the choices by coercion ,nudges simply change the presentation of the choices in such a way that people were more likely to choose options that are best for them.

Or consider the case of a wife who hides her sleeping pills so that her potentially suicidal husband cannot use them. It is an act intended to produce good for the agent which might be thought to place the burden of proof on those who object to paternalism.


If one believes, as Plato does, that acting wrongly damages the soul of the agent, then it will be possible to invoke moral paternalism rather than legal moralism. It has been referred to as New Paternalism or Libertarian Paternalism. After all, if we were capable choosers why not just present us with the reasons which favor our acting in particular and in to a was not you i of it the be he his but for are this that by on at they with which she or from had we will have an what been one if would who has her.

1. a.


Describe the argument Alan Goldman presents in “The Refutation of Medical Paternalism”. The argument that Alan Goldman presents in his essay “The Refutation of Medical Paternalism” is against the strong paternalism except in a few extraordinary cases.

He does not support the medical practice in which the doctor can decide to proceed with the medical treatment against the will of %(1). Download-Theses Mercredi 10 juin The issue of paternalism arises with respect to restrictions by the law such as anti-drug legislation, the compulsory wearing of seatbelts, and in medical contexts by the withholding of relevant information concerning a patient’s condition by physicians.

Moderation / Criticism / Exposition / Exposés David Aaronovitch. Catholics try, rather unconvincingly, to show how conferring sainthood is different in principle to the pagan apotheosis (the process that made Claudius, for instance, into a God), but the distinction doesn't quite wash.

Immanuel Kant (/ k æ n t /; German: [ʔɪˈmaːnu̯eːl ˈkant, -nu̯ɛl -]; 22 April – 12 February ) was a German philosopher who is a central figure in modern philosophy.

In his doctrine of transcendental idealism, he argued that space, time and causation are mere sensibilities; "things-in-themselves" exist, but their nature is unknowable. In his view, the mind shapes and.

The refutation of medical paternalism by alan goldman
Rated 3/5 based on 12 review